ZBB 2024, 40
Bank Resolution and Fundamental Rights – A view from Strasbourg
This article summarises and puts into context the limited but important case law of the European Court of Human Rights concerning bank resolution procedures, in particular under Article 6 (the right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal established by law) and Article 1 of the First Protocol (the right of property), as well as the important issue of who has standing under Article 34 to bring proceedings in the name or on behalf of an affected affected bank, its (former) management, share holders, bond holders, creditors or others affected.
Contents
- I. Introduction
- II. The applicability of Article 6 (“right to a fair trial”)
- III. The Requirements of Article 6
- 1. Practical access to a court
- 2. Requisite degree of judicial control
- 3. Lack of remedy required by international agreement or obligation
- 4. Execution
- IV. Article 1 of the First Protocol (“right of property”)
- 1. Attribution/State Liability
- 2. The meaning of “property”
- 3. The applicable limb of A1P1
- 4. Public interest, proportionality, and lawfulness
- V. Piercing the corporate veil: Standing under Article 34 ECHR
- *
- *)Judge (elected in respect of the United Kingdom), European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg
Der Inhalt dieses Beitrags ist nicht frei verfügbar.
Für Abonnenten ist der Zugang zu Aufsätzen und Rechtsprechung frei.
Sollten Sie über kein Abonnement verfügen, können Sie den gewünschten Beitrag trotzdem kostenpflichtig erwerben:
Erwerben Sie den gewünschten Beitrag kostenpflichtig per Rechnung.
Erwerben Sie den gewünschten Beitrag kostenpflichtig mit PayPal.